- Resident-Directed Care or “Culture Change“
- Society for Healthcare Consumer Advocacy
- Immediate Advocacy
- Here are 5 questions designed to improve nonprofits’ advocacy work
In our time, advocacy is organized around networks of advocacy organizations. This networking through organizations was a natural result of both the problems and successes of individual advocacy and the ongoing struggle for disability civil rights. Advocacy organizing brings with it its own strengths and weaknesses, and it won’t surprise any reader of this blog that I view this understanding of advocacy organizations through the lens of Complex Adaptive Systems (CAS).
Any advocacy organization (or for that matter, any system we might focus on for advocacy) has at least three Governing Constraints:
- The organization Mission (why it exists)
- The organization plan for Reproduction (how it keeps the doors open)
- Its framework of Hierarchy (how it controls)
To understand why advocacy organizations have their ups and downs, and how advocacy organizations age, you must understand how these Governing Constraints both cooperate and collaborate for the organization’s work over the course of time. Each of the Constraints creates its own possibility space, and the actual trajectory of the organization is a complex interweaving of collaborative and competitive choices in real-time.
The various parts of the organization’s infrastructure (Board, financing system, staff morale, network relationships both positive and negative, who is defined as a threat or competitor, etc.) also reflect this multi-constraint dynamic.
In modern organizations, even non-work time can reflect this dynamic to a varying extent.